COMPARISON
Ruul vs NATIVE TEAMS
Compare Ruul vs Native Teams - Discover why Ruul is the superior choice for freelancers.
COMPARISON
Compare Ruul vs Native Teams - Discover why Ruul is the superior choice for freelancers.
Ruul's transaction fees are competitive, starting at just 2.75% per invoice, providing a cost-effective solution for freelancers. Conversely, Native Teams has faced criticism for high and sometimes hidden fees on public review platforms.
Ruul caters to a global clientele with support for over 140 currencies, facilitating seamless international transactions. Native Teams' currency support details are less clear, potentially limiting for freelancers with a diverse client base.
Ruul is known for its rapid payout process, typically within 18 hours, ensuring freelancers have timely access to their earnings. In contrast, Native Teams has been reported to have slower payment processing and inconsistencies.
Ruul is committed to providing reliable customer support with clear and prompt communication. Native Teams, however, has been criticized for slow responses and issues with account verification.
Ruul offers a comprehensive suite of invoicing features, including various payment methods and automated VAT calculations. Native Teams' invoicing capabilities are reported to be more limited.
Ruul's services are available in over 190 countries, offering extensive global coverage. Native Teams, on the other hand, have a more limited reach with 55 countries.
For freelancers who prioritize reliability, cost-effectiveness, and a global approach in their invoicing and payment collection service, Ruul turns out to be the better alternative. Its lower fees, extensive currency support, quick payouts, and vast global reach make it a superior platform for freelancers. Additionally, Ruul's commitment to excellent customer support and a user-friendly experience further solidify its position as the preferred choice for freelancers worldwide.
Join the 100.000+ talents using Ruul.
Have doubts? Read 350+ reviews here.
